Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/07/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Elmar 90mm f4 LTM
From: smithjeffery at mac.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:24:18 -0700
References: <CADjf=X+MCRh7fT-10G-taZ+Ff7We1ji0m4TsuJ+0JhLjeaKZNQ@mail.gmail.com>

I've had the opportunity to shoot some film in the 90/4 Elmar. FP4+ in ID-11 
(1+3). Taken at a backyard barbecue.

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jeffery+Smith/Nicholle+and+Buddy.jpg.html 
<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jeffery+Smith/Nicholle+and+Buddy.jpg.html>

Jeffery

> On Jul 20, 2021, at 6:27 AM, Alan Magayne-Roshak via LUG <lug at 
> leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> Per the discussion on the Elmar 90mm f4 LTM, I think it might almost be too
> sharp for a portrait lens.  I took this when my only lenses for my M3 were
> the 50 Summicron
> collapsible and this 1946 Elmar 90 that I bought for $49.00 in 1974.  The
> stop was f/5.6.  View large and notice the stray hair on the cheek.
> 
> <
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Portraits/Charisse/19750712_MR_Charisse_2.jpg.html
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Alan
> 
> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Photo Services
> (Retired)
> UPAA Photographer of the Year 1978
> UPAA Master of the Profession 2014
> amagayneroshak at gmail.com
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/>
> 
> "All the technique in the world doesn't compensate
> for an inability to notice. " - Elliott Erwitt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Leica Elmar 90mm f4 LTM)
In reply to: Message from amagayneroshak at gmail.com (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Leica Elmar 90mm f4 LTM)