Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/06/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Leica 135mm Apo Telyt M
From: roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:10:19 -0700
References: <CAH1UNJ2aVEv_vRPXscsYEn=TUHE6cEKCb2p==4ahsYrEM2T4jA@mail.gmail.com> <943f8e4a-82e0-3299-7461-6278e23e3918@summaventures.com> <CAJ3Pgh7nG-x0mk4s+tirxeissuLNw2xkTvYK3gJrCN3Sh7--eQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFfkXxvXttdAZVRyN6sfQm-aa3QY7T6EVNOkf8C4EQkFOpwoGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh5O8KpCyJcS2V7-8wpx3jggmZuE0iMN=zvSmkZMOpp9vg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ3CZ-i_w612296etT4r0UxdhcKnES107CgkfOW_ha4imA@mail.gmail.com>
 
Jayanand wrote:

> How will you ever make out that level of difference in a print of any size?
>

Note that the magnifications of the prints are different.

If image quality doesn't matter, why does Leica exist?

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com


On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:02 AM Paul Roark via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I posted a same-size screen grab of the Leica 135 and Canon 200 at
> > https://www.paulroark.com/Leica-apo-135-v-Canon-L-70-200-at-200.JPG .
> >
> > They look very similar, but I think the ridge line of the 135 M has a
> > slight advantage.
> >
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:59 AM Sonny Carter via LUG <
> lug at leica-users.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > pix?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Sonny
> > > http://sonc.com <http://sonc.com/look/>
> > > Natchitoches, Louisiana
> > > 1714
> > > Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase
> > >
> > > USA
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:57 AM Paul Roark via LUG <
> lug at leica-users.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I thought this group would appreciate the results of this telephoto
> > > > comparison test.  The question was, between my Canon 70 - 200 f/4 L
> > > series
> > > > lens at 200mm and my Leica 135mm, which could actually render distant
> > > > details the best.  Both were on a Sony a7c.  The Leica 135 won.   And
> > > this
> > > > was at optimum apertures and center.  Off axis and wide open the
> > > > differences would be more pronounced.   (The Canon zoom will soon be
> on
> > > > eBay.)
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > > www.PaulRoark.com
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Leica Users Group.
> > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] Leica 135mm Apo Telyt M)
Reply from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Leica 135mm Apo Telyt M)
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Leica 135mm Apo Telyt M)
 In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Old Photographs)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Old Photographs)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] Leica 135mm Apo Telyt M)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Leica 135mm Apo Telyt M)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] Leica 135mm Apo Telyt M)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Leica 135mm Apo Telyt M)