Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina:? I've noticed similar color shifts on some of my old Kodachrome slides. This 1971 shot looks across backlit Franconia Notch, New Hampshire from the summit of Cannon Mountain (home of the now-collapsed Old Man of the Mountains). <https://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/5521434976> When I scanned the slide 8 years ago, most of the darker portions of the clouds were purplish, as was the bare rock atop the ridge. I adjusted it as best I could back then.? I couldn't get the ridge more neutral without messing up the rest of the picture.? I don't know if the purple cast is how the slide originally appeared, or if it's due to aging. The exposure I made was a compromise to fit the scene's large dynamic range on a slide, and the brightest and darkest portions are certainly at or a bit beyond Kodachrome's ability to do colors "right." Here's the Old Man himself later that same day, in more reasonable lighting: <https://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/5500475409/> Leica M2, 50 DR Summicron (ridge) and 90/2.8 Tele Elmarit (Old Man). Kodachrome 64, IIRC. I don't remember if I used my current Canon FS-4000, or the Nikon LS-2500 I had previously. --Peter Tina wrote: > Here is a straight scan of Kodachrome using the Nikon LS5000. This is > using Vuescan's profile for Kodachrome with Light cleaning applied on > import: > > https://pbase.com/tinamanley/image/170045859 > > Here is the same scan after I have color corrected (based on the castle > wall) and applied a little Dehaze which I like because of the details it > brings out in the background.? It does also bring out the grain but, as I > said, I like grain in film photos. > > https://pbase.com/tinamanley/image/170024636 > > This is Kodachrome from 1976 in a cardboard mount with square corners > instead of the rounded corners they used later. > > I can understand how some would prefer the original scan with less grain > but I don't. > > Thanks! > > Tina