Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I prefer the grain of the original scan but the colors of the corrected one. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 13 Nov 2019, at 14:44, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is a straight scan of Kodachrome using the Nikon LS5000. This is > using Vuescan's profile for Kodachrome with Light cleaning applied on > import: > > https://pbase.com/tinamanley/image/170045859 > > Here is the same scan after I have color corrected (based on the castle > wall) and applied a little Dehaze which I like because of the details it > brings out in the background. It does also bring out the grain but, as I > said, I like grain in film photos. > > https://pbase.com/tinamanley/image/170024636 > > This is Kodachrome from 1976 in a cardboard mount with square corners > instead of the rounded corners they used later. > > I can understand how some would prefer the original scan with less grain > but I don't. > > Thanks! > > Tina > > -- > Tina Manley > www.tinamanley.com > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley > <http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html> > *https://www.alamy.com/portfolio/649596.html > <https://www.alamy.com/portfolio/649596.html>* > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ >