Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] More 16-35
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 04:45:23 -0400
References: <868AAE08-CD5E-4024-A864-0D280BAEC0C9@att.net> <08BCB7C8-C3B9-4FBF-ACC7-2833450EF51B@gmail.com> <CA+3n+_k_rD7KkxW-QuU8CCiVARB0o02Kc1J8UsyqmtM9Dwf4KQ@mail.gmail.com> <B92B63C4-CE1F-4BB4-A9AF-2405FFC48A81@gmail.com>

They never vignette enough for me.
I'd buy a reverse vignette filter if they ever made one.
Edge darkening. Not lightening.

 
 

-- 

Mark William Rabiner
Photographer

?On 9/21/18, 2:04 AM, "LUG on behalf of Philippe via LUG" 
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of lug at 
leica-users.org> wrote:

    This I know Don, from experience over the decades and the many brands 
I?ve used.
    
    As well as vignetting, learned the hard way in my film times...
    
    It?s the amount of them (fall-off and vignetting) that I?d like to be 
able to assess, hence my remarks/suggestions.
    
    Amities
    
    Philippe
    
    
    
    > Le 20 sept. 2018 ? 23:08, Don Dory via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> a 
?crit :
    > 
    > I believe that the sharpness missing in the corners is due to depth of
    > field issues.  Almost all ultra wides have significant sharpness 
falloff as
    > you move off center.
    > 
    > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:05 PM Philippe via LUG <lug at 
leica-users.org>
    > wrote:
    > 
    >> Thanks - there's a serious loss of sharpness in the angles at this
    >> aperture (thinking of the decaying trunk where flare appears in the 
bottom
    >> left corner too), but the center is (way) more than fine by my 
standards.
    >> 
    >> Now, had you shot the flowers at a wider aperture, and these at f.11, 
I
    >> certainly would be the last one to blame you ?
    >> 
    >> ;-)
    >> 
    >> 
    >> How is distortion when shooting less bucolic scenes, for instance the
    >> facade of a building at the smallest end of the zoom range, or the
    >> structure of a shopping mall, is the next question I?m aking myself 
:-)
    >> 
    >> Keep them coming :-)
    >> 
    >> Amities
    >> 
    >> Philippe
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >>> Le 20 sept. 2018 ? 19:38, James Handsfield <jhandsfield at att.net> a
    >> ?crit :
    >>> 
    >>> Here are four more shot this morning at Henderson Park, Tucker, GA.
    >> These are all shot at 16mm and wide open for comparison.
    >>> 
    >>> 
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/jhandsfield_att_net/Henderson+Park/
    >> 
<http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/jhandsfield_att_net/Henderson+Park/>
    >>> 
    >>> 
    >>> Jim Handsfield
    >>> jhandsfield at att.net
    >>> 
    >>> 
    >>> 
    >>> 
    >>> 
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>> Leica Users Group.
    >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    >> 
    >> 
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Leica Users Group.
    >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    > 
    > -- 
    > Don
    > don.dory at gmail.com
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Leica Users Group.
    > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Leica Users Group.
    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from jhandsfield at att.net (James Handsfield) ([Leica] More 16-35)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] More 16-35)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] More 16-35)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] More 16-35)