Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] lightroom
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:33:25 -0400
References: <8B4EFBEA-9FA1-4D62-B032-7ED3AE369B2B@cartersxrd.net> <23f71e66-8104-91bc-a3a6-83237acaa26f@lighttube.net> <849903C8-D5BC-4ACC-9859-B1E82881E983@rabinergroup.com> <BA86E0D3-4373-47DC-8EF9-53DF145B5C52@mac.com>

Yes I also agree with Jim calling processing processing. As that?s what it 
is. And that?s what I wrote.

 
 

-- 

Mark William Rabiner
Photographer

On 10/18/17, 3:42 PM, "LUG on behalf of Steve Barbour" 
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of 
stevebarbour at mac.com> wrote:

    
    
    > On Oct 18, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:
    > 
    > Jim what?s on my mind as of late is your use of the word ?processing? 
to mean ?processing?!
    > It?s a breath of fresh air!
    > ?Processing? is not called ?processing? 
    
    often
    
    
    
    
    
    yes I agree , but Jim called it processing, since that is what it is !
    
    
    > it?s called anything but.
    > It?s called ?editing? it?s called ?shopping? its called ?post 
processing? its called ?image manipulation?.
    > But it?s never just called ?processing? any more.  That would be bad.
    > They want to make it sound evil; like something you should not do.
    > Sorry! It?s a pet peeve of mine.
    > 
snip 
    > -- 
    > 
    > Mark William Rabiner
    > Yes I process my pictures and I?m proud of it!
    > 
    > On 10/18/17, 11:41 AM, "LUG on behalf of Jim Nichols" 
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of jhnichols 
at lighttube.net> wrote:
    > 
    >    Ric, I was late making the move to LRCC, having been unimpressed 
during 
    >    my earlier attempts to use the trial versions.  But, I finally 
bought 
    >    into the subscription version, and, with some effort, have learned 
to 
    >    appreciate what it can do.  I do not take advantage of its indexing 
and 
    >    filing systems, preferring my earlier system.  But, for photo 
    >    processing, it works great for me.  The $11, including tax, that 
shows 
    >    up on my Visa bill each month blends right in with simple meal 
charges, 
    >    and is not much of a burden.  For me, it meets my needs.
    > 
    >    Jim Nichols
    >    Tullahoma, TN USA
    > 
    >    On 10/18/2017 10:31 AM, RicCarter wrote:
    >> Now that Adobe appears to have screwed the pooch on any future of 
using Lightroom without a subscription, where are we headed?
    >> 
    >> suggestions?
    >> 
    >> renting software just seems too much like ransomware to me
    >> 
    >> ric
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Leica Users Group.
    >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    >> 
    > 
    > 
    >    _______________________________________________
    >    Leica Users Group.
    >    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Leica Users Group.
    > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Leica Users Group.
    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] lightroom)
In reply to: Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] lightroom)