Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] lightroom
From: stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:42:48 -0700
References: <8B4EFBEA-9FA1-4D62-B032-7ED3AE369B2B@cartersxrd.net> <23f71e66-8104-91bc-a3a6-83237acaa26f@lighttube.net> <849903C8-D5BC-4ACC-9859-B1E82881E983@rabinergroup.com>


> On Oct 18, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Jim what?s on my mind as of late is your use of the word ?processing? to 
> mean ?processing?!
> It?s a breath of fresh air!
> ?Processing? is not called ?processing? 

often





yes I agree , but Jim called it processing, since that is what it is !


> it?s called anything but.
> It?s called ?editing? it?s called ?shopping? its called ?post processing? 
> its called ?image manipulation?.
> But it?s never just called ?processing? any more.  That would be bad.
> They want to make it sound evil; like something you should not do.
> Sorry! It?s a pet peeve of mine.
> 
> Processing. 
> It comes after talking a picture a bit down the line.
> 1. Editing
> 2. Shopping
> 3. Post Processing
> 4. Image manipulation.
>   Are all words which have replaced it.
> Weasel words!
> 
> -- 
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Yes I process my pictures and I?m proud of it!
> 
> On 10/18/17, 11:41 AM, "LUG on behalf of Jim Nichols" 
> <lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of 
> jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote:
> 
>    Ric, I was late making the move to LRCC, having been unimpressed during 
>    my earlier attempts to use the trial versions.  But, I finally bought 
>    into the subscription version, and, with some effort, have learned to 
>    appreciate what it can do.  I do not take advantage of its indexing and 
>    filing systems, preferring my earlier system.  But, for photo 
>    processing, it works great for me.  The $11, including tax, that shows 
>    up on my Visa bill each month blends right in with simple meal charges, 
>    and is not much of a burden.  For me, it meets my needs.
> 
>    Jim Nichols
>    Tullahoma, TN USA
> 
>    On 10/18/2017 10:31 AM, RicCarter wrote:
>> Now that Adobe appears to have screwed the pooch on any future of using 
>> Lightroom without a subscription, where are we headed?
>> 
>> suggestions?
>> 
>> renting software just seems too much like ransomware to me
>> 
>> ric
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    Leica Users Group.
>    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] lightroom)
In reply to: Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] lightroom)