Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?DOUGLAS
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 23:58:45 +0100
References: <3102AFDA-E450-4F4B-AB03-A7A8973AE34A@fastmail.com> <7BCAB2D88BEE4631BE521C119C7DED49@Family> <C3251951-476D-4306-9FC3-A9E4E9F260FA@gmail.com>

Ahh, that explains why I hear cursing in French when I forget to switch the 
shower heating on...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philippe" <photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm 
cameras?DOUGLAS


I also still have a Retinette and a Minister in some drawer ? fond memories

Or it is we're living in the same house ;-)

Amities
Philippe


Le 17 sept. 2016 ? 01:34, Douglas Barry <imra at iol.ie> a ?crit :

> According to my list, I have a Halina 35X somewhere in the attic with a 
> 45mm, a couple of Kodak Retinette 1s with 45mms, and a Yashica Minister 
> also with a 45mm.
>
> Douglas
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Bridge" <abridge683 at 
> fastmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 10:45 PM
> Subject: [Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?
>
>
>> Let me back up a moment.
>>
>> I was taught that a ?normal? lens is one whose focal length matches the 
>> diagonal of the film/sensor frame.
>>
>> For 35mm film as shot by, say, a Leica M6, that turns out to be 43mm - 
>> midway between a wide 35mm lens and a 50mm lens which I have sometimes 
>> seen called a ?short telephoto? perhaps even by B&H.
>>
>> Now as I remember from my cinema days 35mm movies are shot at the same 
>> aspect ratio as still but have different dimensions since they are shot 
>> with the long edge running across the film instead of the short edge as 
>> is the case for full frame 35mm film photography (except, I?m guessing, 
>> half-frame 35mm but now I?m totally out of school having never seen one 
>> of these cameras.
>>
>> That?s where I?m coming from. And wondering why we don?t see more 
>> 40-something focal length lenses. I know that there 48?s out there? Nikon 
>> maybe from the old days? Mark Rabiner, you talked about this at some 
>> point, I think.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from abridge683 at fastmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras?)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] How did 50mm become the "normal" lens for 35mm cameras? DOUGLAS)