Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/08/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree. As the actress said to the bishop - size does matter. It would be interesting to see the 33 x 28 cm format Douglas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Moore" <jbmmllug at jbm.org> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 9:18 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Ideas on LUG Book 2016 > I'm glad to hear you haven't been driven away by last year's muttering > minority, because I very much like the way the book you sequenced > turned out. > > Running contrary to the cost concerns I'm seeing... the thing I've > long wanted to see changed about the LUG book would be a move to the > largest available paper format available from Blurb. I think the > images would have a better chance of shining printed larger, given the > resolution limits of the printing process. I don't expect it to > happen, but I'll express the opinion this year as I have in previous > years. > > I'd be glad to send more than two images to give you more fodder to > work with - and it'd be fine with me if you made the decision about > which and how many to use, as long as I got my vanity minimum of two > in. My only concern with that is that if there are multiple on-page > sizes being worked with, I'd prefer to be able to submit print-ready > versions optimally scaled and sharpened for the precise size at which > they'd be printed, just as (I assume) we must all be rendering while > viewing proof images with the Blurb color profile taken into account. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >