Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] I think it can not be fixed
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:15:57 -0700
References: <AE7C3A05-F7FF-4264-BA4F-4DF51DD04658@gmail.com> <6C829736-3460-4D2A-871F-9FDAA9D1D0E1@frozenlight.eu> <E4D49B3B-4796-4645-A090-347D6729A845@gmail.com> <BA20AE8F-9745-4EA0-86CD-F00A0F1D8238@gmail.com> <6CF06C9C-FEEC-45D4-A4DD-BF366B1F0E34@frozenlight.eu>

You will love it, I am sure. We did that in digital with Lluis in Barcelona. 
I agree would love to shoot film as you will, have not done it. The main 
reason is related to the small number of images you can get, per roll.


have fun Nathan.

Steve



> On Jul 31, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
> wrote:
> 
> I am not Lluis, Steve, and I am no expert but I have recently gone back to 
> film for, say, 10-15% of my shooting. Why? Because it has some ?je ne sais 
> quoi? to it?tonality, magic, whatever. And there is a distinct pleasure in 
> shooting my Leica M2 with period lenses like the 50mm Summilux from the 
> 1960s or the 90mm Tele-Elmarit that still deliver such superb images. It 
> may not be wholly rational, but nobody is paying me to take pictures?I 
> have a good day job which provides me with a decent living?so I can take 
> pictures in whatever way pleases me. 
> 
> I am going to spend a day with Lluis in his summer home, Sitges, about 30 
> km south of Barcelona. The plan is to walk around with him, and hopefully 
> use his invisibilty cloak and his charm to get some decent shots of my 
> own. I plan to shoot mainly film?I will take a digital camera with me to 
> supplement the M2, but most likely it will be just the Ricoh GR or perhaps 
> the Fuji X-T1 with just one lens, the tiny but superb 27mm.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 31 Jul 2016, at 18:07, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Lluis, a question to run by you, now an expert, if this same image has 
>> been shot digitally, would you have had more power to fix it, the way you 
>> would like?
>> 
>> many thanks,
>> 
>> amities,
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 8:56 AM, lluisripollphotography 
>>> <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thank you Nathan, I forget it, as you say I have other images to work
>>> 
>>> Un abrazo
>>> Lluis
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> El 30 jul 2016, a les 7:15, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> va 
>>>> escriure:
>>>> 
>>>> Lluis, I am sure you can do something using Photoshop heroics and other 
>>>> voodoo but given how many great images you have in your files, it just 
>>>> does not seem worth the effort.
>>>> 
>>>> Un abrazo,
>>>> Nathan
>>>> 
>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
>>>> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: 
>>>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
>>>> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
>>>> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>>> YNWA
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 30 Jul 2016, at 02:30, lluisripollphotography 
>>>>> <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please take a look to this picture from 1992 (please view large), I 
>>>>> like very much the expression and the moment but the picture is bad, 
>>>>> beside the negative is dirty and I would have to clean, the picture is 
>>>>> undefined, out of focus, I think I can?t anything to improve it? any 
>>>>> idea?
>>>>> 
>>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Vintage/Vilanova_Vintage/199202007LR5.jpg.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for looking, your c&c will be appreciated
>>>>> Lluis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I think it can not be fixed)