Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The new Hasselblad is announced
From: billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:24:02 -0500
References: <9E784D63-ADB0-4584-AE45-C13A045E6532@gmail.com> <519BAA5A-0BEF-4DF2-B3C5-82FA252D4A96@verizon.net> <48AAD378-977D-4787-BCFE-78E6A17728C8@gmail.com> <43EB763F-B9D9-4E85-B65E-EF9057B1FA9D@verizon.net> <A4Js1t00T07g8Sg014Jt9B>

That's stretching credibility. One has little or nothing to do with the 
other.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Sonny Carter
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:18 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] The new Hasselblad is announced

I think 645 was called medium format because it used medium format film, not 
because of the frame size.

from my iPad

Sonny Carter

> On Jun 22, 2016, at 8:17 PM, Frank Verizon 2 2016 <red735i at verizon.net> 
> wrote:
>
> Sometime in the long ago, some marketing guy thought the rather obscure 
> 645 size ( remember the A16 Hassy back?) was MF.  At that time, there was 
> 6x6 and 645.  ( and 6x7; 6x9; and even 6x8). All the numbers referred to 
> film size in mm.  They all used a common 120 film size.
> Then someone thought that 6x6 was a dead end and there were no more 6x6 
> cameras being made. They were all 645....the other sizes went dead.
> So magically, 645 became the MF standard (and only size).
> With the advent of digital, 645 became a ratio (4:3), not a mm size, and 
> so now we have digital MF sensors that measure 44x33mm
>
> There are larger sensors.... But none measure 56x56 mm, the old time MF 
> standard
>
> We can only hope some sensor in the future will measure 56x56mm. My CF 
> lenses will cover the sensor, easily.
>
> Frank
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 22, 2016, at 6:58 PM, lluisripollphotography 
> <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Neither for me I think, I don?t like operate on cameras in Menu mode 
> neither with EVF, on the other hand this one is not exactly a MF camera, 
> IMHO it is equivalent to a smaller 4,5 x 6, the CMOS sensor is 43.8 ? 
> 32.9mm, for me the true MF (at least in film)  is 60 x 60 mm (2 1/4" x 2 
> 1/4?).
>
> Lluis
>
>
>
>
>> El 22 juny 2016, a les 23:16, Frank Verizon 2 2016 <red735i at 
>> verizon.net> 
>> va escriure:
>>
>> Appears to be a Leica SL on steroids, at a discount store price.
>> Does 2 lenses sound familiar?
>> No zoom yet, no H lens adapter yet.
>> Fully electronic lens to body connections mean that CF,C, and F lenses 
>> will not work, unless they make a special adapter available
>>
>> It is substantially lighter than my Leaf + 500CM system, a good thing.
>>
>> I am unconvinced it is a path for me.
>>
>> Frank Filippone
>>
>> <http://www.hasselblad.com/x1d>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] The new Hasselblad is announced)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] The new Hasselblad is announced)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Verizon 2 2016) ([Leica] The new Hasselblad is announced)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] The new Hasselblad is announced)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Verizon 2 2016) ([Leica] The new Hasselblad is announced)