Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG Yearbook 2015 aftermath
From: geneduprey2015 at gmail.com (Gene Duprey)
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:37:21 -0600
References: <21423297.1453091179254.JavaMail.root@elwamui-darkeyed.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Richard,
It certainly was a well put together book in my opinion.  It gets my
praises, and I hope you reconsider and do it again next year.

Gene


On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Montie <montoid at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Concur completely.
>
> Montie
>
>
> >>Richard--as a journalist of more than half a century, I must say that no
> effort in print ever is accepted by 100 percent of the readers.
>    I believe your outstanding effort has the approval of a majority of
> those
> who participated. That a few have disagreed is regretful but hardly an
> excuse to abandon the project. To have expected total approval from synch a
> collection of creative souls was foolish.
>    You did an admirable and professional job. If you are certain in your
> decision then you go with my strongest approval and my sincere regret.
>    I, for one, hope you will take time to reconsider.
>
> Bill Clough
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie) ([Leica] LUG Yearbook 2015 aftermath)