Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Burnt Mill Bar
From: red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 08:03:49 -0800
References: <CA+yJO1BGGtfK9rkskidtQBLgr=iGBb_bPchSwYCXPHtwTbLJxA@mail.gmail.com> <39572B7B-55EB-4C27-B1B2-571CC6E501EC@icloud.com> <CA+yJO1CFANiwhUCUTzY81f-_phvFnr3hNcOrd=34U6=t4Rgn9Q@mail.gmail.com> <00de01d13b3e$2dbbf980$8933ec80$@verizon.net> <CA+yJO1AvMqNiiXT8xwaDhOupci+9=U5DpcLud3OXuoOaA89Gyg@mail.gmail.com>

Even though it is counter-intuitive, try MF the SL for a few shots... No
Laser Beam.....  less noticeability....  
You should still be able to successfully out focus the MM. 

Frank Filippone
Red735i at verizon.net


-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org] On 
Behalf
Of Tina Manley
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 7:55 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMGS: Burnt Mill Bar

Thanks, Frank.  I was using AF with the SL.  It used the laser beam to focus
and I got some startled looks.  Because it was so dark in the bar, the beam
was very noticeable.  One guy came over to admire my camera and asked how to
pronounce Leica.

Tina

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net>
wrote:

> Sure was a dark bar... Personally I like the shot of Tom and the
owner.....
>
> Some of the intimidation factor comes from the big lenses on SLRs.  
> The
> 24-90 on the SL is no different.
> Some comes from the big camera.  ( I do not think the SL is big enough 
> to cause this) Some comes from the combination of both.....
>
> Wait till there is a non-zoom AF lens, and try again....  I'll bet you 
> get different results.....
>
> Were you manually focusing the SL or allowing it to AF?
>
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
>
> Thanks, Gerry.  Yes, the baby powder is for putting on your hands so 
> they don't stick to the pool cue.  Taking both cameras was an 
> experiment on my part to see which one handled the almost no light in 
> the bar best.  I knew it was going to be dim.  My conclusions are that 
> the SL is much easier to focus but the MM is much less noticeable - 
> about what I expected.  I think I would have to take 10x as many 
> photos with the MM to get the same number in focus that I did with the 
> SL, but it's probably worth it for discretion
> - even though nobody objected to being photographed with either.
>
> Tina
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



--
Tina Manley
http://
<http://t.sidekickopen32.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgf
mKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistweb
sites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=a32448fe-e062-466b-a7b2-0f2c5cdb67d5>
www.tinamanley.com
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Burnt Mill Bar)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Burnt Mill Bar)
Message from gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] IMGS: Burnt Mill Bar)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Burnt Mill Bar)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] IMGS: Burnt Mill Bar)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Burnt Mill Bar)