Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No need to get emotional about it, Frank. Nobody attacked you ad hominem, this is a legitimate exchange of views. Nowhere in my message did I say that your methods are worthless, I just said what I do. As far as I can see, nobody else said anything like that either. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 06 Dec 2015, at 16:39, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote: > > Wonderful, and my methods, which are more scientific, which is how I was > trained, are therefore false? Worthless? Of no value to the general > community? Or time wasting? > > Why? In what way? > > Why was there even response like this? Did someone see it as a public > challenge to their methodologies? > > Isn't their room for BOTH ( or more) approaches, without negative > connotations ( or responses) to either? > > It is time to use the delete button if you are not interested in reading > something..... about technical, artistic, and every other kind of > issue..... > > Just because you own a keyboard, is no reason to be impolite or intolerant > or argumentative...... or just plain negative. > > Use the delete key. More often, apparently. > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information