Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Now now lads & Lasses, please let's not snap at anyone due to their methods and what one does with their gear? It's to each his/her own. Everyone take a deep breath and sit back from the screen for a moment and just laugh at it all! WHY? Cause if we didn't have moments like this once and a while it would be as boring as hell! J We all approach our lives differently, our gear and what we shoot differently! That's why this LUG Crew are the best of any about and around the world! Yes once in awhile a subject becomes a tad heavy duty, boring, pain in the ass, infuriating! Whatever? WHY? Well cause we're all brothers and sisters and what brother & sister never barked at each other? During my over 60 years or more using cameras and lenses my "testing as such?" Put on camera go shoot the assignment, get a bit of praise, get paid, put camera back in bag until next shoot! And when using a new Leica lens it was usually because I needed it for an immediate shoot! KISS SIMPLE! J It was out of box onto camera, shoot assignment, look at contact sheets, smile J cause there were some new style LOOK images! .... Because of cool lens capturing cool images and pleased that I caught the kind of images I knew I wanted to get. ERGO? you laugh all the way to the bank after the client paid you! J There you go folks, do yer thing as each of us are as different as a ripe box of strawberries! J cheers, Dr. ted -----Original Message----- From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Wajsman Sent: December-06-15 9:03 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Which has more central Resolution: Sony 28-70 or Leica 28-70? No need to get emotional about it, Frank. Nobody attacked you ad hominem, this is a legitimate exchange of views. Nowhere in my message did I say that your methods are worthless, I just said what I do. As far as I can see, nobody else said anything like that either. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 06 Dec 2015, at 16:39, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote: > > Wonderful, and my methods, which are more scientific, which is how I was trained, are therefore false? Worthless? Of no value to the general community? Or time wasting? > > Why? In what way? > > Why was there even response like this? Did someone see it as a public challenge to their methodologies? > > Isn't their room for BOTH ( or more) approaches, without negative connotations ( or responses) to either? > > It is time to use the delete button if you are not interested in reading something..... about technical, artistic, and every other kind of issue..... > > Just because you own a keyboard, is no reason to be impolite or intolerant or argumentative...... or just plain negative. > > Use the delete key. More often, apparently. > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus