Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Still trying to be sure I got the meaning of that triple-negative right, Frank. There?s brain stimulation right there! I like your ideas. I?ll try them, especially the suggestion to put the filter in front of a different lens. ?howard > On Nov 17, 2015, at 6:38 AM, Frank Verizon <red735i at verizon.net> wrote: > > First of all. The lens is probably the place to start. Take the same > filter, same scene, but change the lens. What happens? Different lenses > have different spectral responses... Do you prefer the signature of one > over another? Some place I was reading about lenses that were tested for > UV? Ir? and there was a set of lenses that were tested and found "better" > for the purpose. Note that they were not Leica, but rather lenses that > would, for normal photography, be considered mundane or less. > > It might be valuable to you to review other IR shots from the WEB. while > the ability to find the setup (lens, filter, sensor, time of year), there > is some of that data available out there. > > Scientific use of IR would never not accept unsharpness, if it were > unacceptable in the resultant study. What do those people use? > > All of which is relevant if you want sharp IR images. > All of which is irrelevant if you like what you are getting now. > > Or is it pure brain stimulation that you seek....? > > > Frank Filippone