Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]those are the pretty much the ONLY times ric > On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:38 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: > > Oh yes, I use it for panoramas and layers, but for everyday photography? > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > genuine answers: > > panoramas > > I like the crop tool that let?s me square up photos > > > ric > > > >> On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:10 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: >> >> What do you do with your pictures in Photoshop that cannot be done in >> Lightroom? Genuine question. >> >> I have used PS since early versions, looking at 2015 CC there is >> little comparison to earlier versions so why hark back to LR v1? >> >> john >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> I do have Lightroom 1 since 2006 its still loaded on this computer and >> it was the second version which really made it viable for image >> processing as well as browsing and organizing. The image manipulation >> stuff in this first version is very minimal a few tweaks and they told >> you up front you'd be for sure opening it in Photoshop with a touch of >> a button. I think it sold like hotcakes and plenty of people have no >> intention of opening their images up in anything if they really didn't >> have to and doing anything to them. So Lightroom became the digital >> program for digital photography and they added the world "Photoshop" to > it. >> >> I asked a gal in a caf? sitting next to me if she used Photoshop. She >> said yes. She used LightRoom. >> >> History of LightRoom: >> >> http://www.mosaicarchive.com/2012/10/24/the-history-of-lightroom/ >> >> >> >> On 10/14/15 11:25 AM, "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Not so Mark. >>> >>> Even the first version of Lightroom had most of the photo-relevant >>> manipulation capabilities of the then current version of Photoshop. >>> >>> It did have these functions organised differently, and added a >>> cataloging system suitable for photographers, but it was by no means >>> just >> a browser. >>> >>> Who told you that it was a browser with add-ons as an afterthought? >>> Somebody has been really pulling the wool! >>> >>> cheers, >>> Frank >>> >>> >>>> On 14 Oct 2015, at 15:37, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> As LightRoom was designed to be a browser which as an afterthought >>>> had some picture "editing" as in processing: cropping etc >>>> capabilities put in as an afterthought and then developed with later >> versions. >>>> >>>> Photoshop itself was first designed as a program to make it so you >>>> could change a Tiff file to a Jpeg or other file formats back and forth. >>>> When you do that the image would sometimes darken or lighten. >>>> So they had to put controls in there to tweak that. >>>> Hence Photoshop. It had another name at first. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information