Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:25:52 +0100
References: <D243E0F9.49D4B%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Not so Mark.

Even the first version of Lightroom had most of the photo-relevant 
manipulation capabilities of the then current version of Photoshop.

It did have these functions organised differently, and added a cataloging 
system suitable for photographers, but it was by no means just a browser.

Who told you that it was a browser with add-ons as an afterthought? Somebody 
has been really pulling the wool!

cheers,
Frank


> On 14 Oct 2015, at 15:37, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
> As LightRoom was designed to be a browser which as an afterthought had some
> picture "editing" as in processing: cropping etc capabilities put in as an
> afterthought and then developed with later versions.
> 
> Photoshop itself was first designed as a program to make it so you could
> change a Tiff file to a Jpeg or other file formats back and forth.
> When you do that the image would sometimes darken or lighten.
> So they had to put controls in there to tweak that.
> Hence Photoshop. It had another name at first.



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
Reply from piers.hemy at gmail.com (Piers Hemy) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)