Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] If not Lightroom, ...
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 04:08:25 -0700
References: <46363AEF-5D5F-407F-82E3-519B1F154E35@aotera.org> <BE96056B-7521-469A-889A-1638884FBF8B@icloud.com> <CAF8hL-G66NMZ=kuypL+PaDUWiSo0Gq92H9DBPx9XGudrT3c=jQ@mail.gmail.com> <52C6060D-BC9E-4812-BD11-74A9E900E38A@aotera.org> <009301d10596$89f45720$9ddd0560$@gmail.com>

Correct. I refuse to use Cloud software unless I am absolutely being forced
to.

Mind you, we are considering a Cloud model for our own software products
but we will not do it the ways most people do it - if we adopt the model,
it will just mean that the users will not get free updates. The existing
software will remain fully functional. We shall see.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Piers Hemy <piers.hemy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Lightroom is available as an outright purchase, Spencer, you do not need
> to subscribe. And you do not need to use the latest "troublesome" version,
> and it is easy enough to backtrack to the earlier release if you wish to
> avoid the problems which some are experiencing.
>
> It is true that the Lightroom approach is different to that taken by
> Photoshop, for example, but I find the LR model much more attuned to how
> photographers think than PS (and almost everyone to whom I have shown
> Lightroom agrees). The image database is almost a free add-on, although I
> find it indispensable.
>
> I cannot offer any comparison to Aperture.
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com at leica-users.org] On
> Behalf Of Spencer Cheng
> Sent: 13 October 2015 09:00
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] If not Lightroom, ...
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> That maybe be true but my spare time is bit limited right now. I rather
> not try to learn new S/W package that sounds like bad QA effort during
> beta. Leaking memory is a pain to track down
> (been-there-done-that-too-many-times) but no S/W should exit beta status
> unless that was resolved. Some Adobe excutroid(s) has their bonus depending
> on the S/W exiting beta.
>
> I can always wait a few months and keep on using Aperture until either
> Apple breaks it or Adobe gets it?s act together. :-)
>
> Regards,
> Spencer
>
> I also hate the S/W rental model that Adobe/MS/Oracle/Cadence/etc uses.
>
> > On Oct 12, 2015, at 23:50, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Adobe is having issues with ONE version of Lightroom. The sky is not
> > falling.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
// https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto


In reply to: Message from spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from piers.hemy at gmail.com (Piers Hemy) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)