Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] If not Lightroom, ...
From: spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 04:00:04 -0400
References: <46363AEF-5D5F-407F-82E3-519B1F154E35@aotera.org> <BE96056B-7521-469A-889A-1638884FBF8B@icloud.com> <CAF8hL-G66NMZ=kuypL+PaDUWiSo0Gq92H9DBPx9XGudrT3c=jQ@mail.gmail.com>
 
Hi Richard,

That maybe be true but my spare time is bit limited right now. I rather not 
try to learn new S/W package that sounds like bad QA effort during beta. 
Leaking memory is a pain to track down (been-there-done-that-too-many-times) 
but no S/W should exit beta status unless that was resolved. Some Adobe 
excutroid(s) has their bonus depending on the S/W exiting beta.

I can always wait a few months and keep on using Aperture until either Apple 
breaks it or Adobe gets it?s act together. :-)

Regards,
Spencer

I also hate the S/W rental model that Adobe/MS/Oracle/Cadence/etc uses.

> On Oct 12, 2015, at 23:50, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Adobe is having issues with ONE version of Lightroom. The sky is not
> falling.
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)
Reply from piers.hemy at gmail.com (Piers Hemy) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)
 In reply to: Message from spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] If not Lightroom, ...)