[Leica] So much for "film is forever"

[spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng)]

I agree BUT it?s really hard to forecast what images will be important in 50 
years and to whom.

Even though the LUG search engine isn't fixed yet, Google has indexed it for 
us. Back in 2003, I wrote the following in response to BD in a thread called 
?Film is Archival?.

<http://leica-users.org/v25/msg00208.html>

After I wrote the above, I was contacted by someone from an NGO working with 
the indigenous tribes in Borneo trying to establish their historical claim 
to their tribal land. All they had was an oral history of the tribe. Not 
acceptable to the modern legal system. I couldn?t help him as the negatives 
we have weren?t dated though we knew they were taken in the 1940's and 50?s 
by my father-in-law.

Food for thought on a rainy day. :-)

Spencer

> On May 15, 2015, at 17:06, George Lottermoser <george.imagist at 
> icloud.com> wrote:
> Indeed.
> The big archival question is, "who gives a s**t about this one of 50K or 
> 500K or 5000K image files; in your 3 ring binders, or on your drives or in 
> your cloud, or fire safe, or safe deposit box, or??"
> 
> Will my "family" care about my "Art"? or just the photos of people they 
> recognize? and happen to still be fond of?
> 
> Go to an antique store. Who are the people in those photographs in box 
> after box? Why didn't their "family" want to keep the images?"
> 
> who ever said the only archives that are going to make it any distance 
> through time are:
> 1) The image maker was quite famous and represented in museums, critical 
> journals, major collections and such.
> 2) The image is of a famous celebrity for good or ill.
> 3) The image is of significant, historical importance and can be 
> recognized as such.
> 4) The collection falls into the hands of someone who "gets it" and can 
> see a way to make a buck.
>