Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would also like to see side by side comparisons but the meantime I'd think the new lens is better than the old one (which I have) on all accounts. This is a key lens in the Leica lineup with high visibility promo value and the last lens Dr. Andreas Kaufmann is going to mess up in any respect. The f1 has trouble with digital. A huge embarrassment for the Leica company. This one costing three times more money and having the fastest design available is not going to have any glitches in it. Its going to be worth it. Leica has the resources to make sure this is the case. Its common on at least this the list to assume that a lens with an aspheric element in it has a harsh look with ruined bokeh. Leica went to bed and woke up stupid. Its as if it goes without saying so that people will make solid statements to this effect without even seeing this first hand on a new lens it not questioned by anybody. I've have four M lenes with aspherics in them and have found that first hand to not be true. Each generation of Leica glass, Nikon too and I'd think Canon gets sharper with better contrast and god forbid they'd forget much better bokeh. As this aspect of a lens is all anyone cares or knows about any more. I find this worship of old glass to be puerile. Even multi coating is looked upon with a negative slant and older simpler coatings revered. They even say this improves film speed. Pay extra for a single coated lens. Less contrast means better shadow detail. Like never. The lens or camera companies are highly competitive and none of them are stupid. The general level of optical engineering improves every minute. I always with few exceptions get the latest a camera company has to offer unless I cant afford it or its no longer made or its more compact or something. If I get old glass I don't claim they make better images. They make cheaper images. On 4/3/15 3:18 PM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > The f1 can create 'dreamier' images, the f0.95 is a bit harsher. I read a > few > years back about someone who had both; he used the f0.95 if he was going > somewhere and had to get a photo (stopped down it is almost as good as any > Leica 50mm) but used the f1 in his own time for personal images. The > colours > from the f0.95 and gorgeous but the f1 is also significantly smaller and > lighter! > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > > Or maybe it's just nostalgia... > > Even if it's purely emotional, I just can't justify having something this > expensive that makes me feel guilty not loving it. > > Sue > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 3, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> There is something lovely and unique about the "older" Notcti's >> indeed! I agree that there is some secret ingredient missing in the >> new 0.95's. I think if I were to see some side-by-side shots I might >> be able to better see a difference. >> Good luck with the sale: many love and produce beautiful images with it. >> Best, >> Bob >> >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Susan Ryan <skalte at icloud.com> wrote: >>> >>> I shot maybe 100 images with it. Just don't love it the way I did my 1.0. >>> $9000. Photos available. Paypal preferred but we can discuss >>> alternatives if necessary. Contact me offlist. >>> >>> Sue Ryan >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/