Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In the past there seemed to have been a consensus that Norman Rockwell's work was corny campy and low brow but in the past decade he's found a new appreciation in the art world. He's fairly well respected now I think. George Lincoln Rockwell still not good. The guy who shot and killed him spent five minutes in a federal penitentiary. Nikon Rockwell has been admitting he prefers Canons and shooting jpegs with uv filters with no lens hoods.. But is leaving his starving family out of it. Google loves his website. On 4/6/15 6:53 PM, "George Lottermoser" <george.imagist at icloud.com> wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Bill Pearce wrote: > >> An interesting take on this. I have found almost all portrait and wedding >> photographers to be the Norman Rockwells of photography, but then again, > > I tend to agree, with the occasional exception. > >> I find painted portraits in whatever medium to be wanting. > > Interesting indeed. > Does this include the so-called Renaissance Masters? > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/