Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Is photography art?
From: george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 17:53:54 -0500
References: <D1485B5C.36F53%mark@rabinergroup.com> <B18C49DD639645C0B1DA2FE67E5F942A@OWNERPC>
 
On Apr 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:

> An interesting take on this. I have found almost all portrait and wedding 
> photographers to be the Norman Rockwells of photography, but then again,

I tend to agree, with the occasional exception.

> I find painted portraits in whatever medium to be wanting.

Interesting indeed.
Does this include the so-called Renaissance Masters?

Regards,
George Lottermoser 

http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Is photography art?)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Is photography art?)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] Is photography art?)