Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Many of Nathan's emails are comments on other peoples pix. He usually post maybe three emails a week with links to his own work, sometimes more. from my iPad Sonny Carter > On Mar 21, 2015, at 2:57 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > > I am not going to check, but Nathan may have sent 5 original emails with > links to 70 images rather than an almost 1:1 ratio which may have resulted > in +60 emails (to five groups).... I am not on three of those groups, what > comments do they make? > > john > > -----Original Message----- > From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of Tina Manley > Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2015 8:49 a.m. > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue > - might be solved, in part > > I'm going by Steve's comment: > > "The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per email, > Tina > 20 emails per pic." > > Tina > >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> >> wrote: >> >> You are going by total emails rather than original emails with link(s) >> to an image? >> >> john >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> For March LUG, so far: >> >> Nathan - 106 e-mails >> Tina - 155 e-mails >> >> Not quite 20 to 1. >> >> Tina >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Steve Barbour >> <steve.barbour at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> Steve Barbour >>> >>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Also, in the last week - since last Sunday, I have posted 13 photos >>> on the LUG. You have posted 70. Is the difference that you are >>> sharing and I am asking for help? >>> >>> The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per >>> email, Tina >>> 20 emails per pic. >>> >>> steve >>> >>> I asked before about posting them one at a time or saving them up >>> and posting a group. The opinions seemed to be divided equally - >>> some wanted one at at time, others preferred a group so I didn't >>> change >> anything. >>> Maybe I should. >>> >>> Tina >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Nathan Wajsman >>> <photo at frozenlight.eu> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tina, >>>> >>>> May I ask a heretical question: are you perhaps taking too many >>>> photos, just because it is so easy with digital? You mention a >>>> figure of 16000 >>> from >>>> your Cuba trip, That is more than I take in a year. Now, I realize >>>> that I am just an amateur while you are a pro, and I also >>>> understand that for >>> your >>>> stock business you need some slight variations of each image, but >>>> still >>> the >>>> number seems excessive. From the way you talk about the editing >>>> process, >>> it >>>> seems to lead to an intolerable burden afterwards, when editing them. >>>> Perhaps a change from this machine-gun approach would be good for >>>> your health? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Nathan >>>> >>>> Nathan Wajsman >>>> >>>> Alicante, Spain >>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu >>>> http://www.greatpix.eu >>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >>>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ >>>> >>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator >>>> >>>> YNWA > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information