Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:57:08 +0000
References: <CA+yJO1B1q37ZLLJ-eZ4QGJabfsq_M0jCJ1=_QpQ7hs+0Lts-zQ@mail.gmail.com> <D1324965.35837%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CA+yJO1BFQLu-HgaeixV2nDURUXnmcAfhWkG3R9bcB5ivCRdcKg@mail.gmail.com> <52000DE2-7C00-4045-BEE6-F7F1B39D34CB@frozenlight.eu> <CA+yJO1ByThERXVLJKK4zbH3icYt7kSFK5_cOgFGV_nNQ6bt2vw@mail.gmail.com> <062C40E2-7B7E-4403-B7EA-AECA4B566E82@gmail.com> <CA+yJO1C2dO04BChcoFOVX6i-d4Z8WtLV2r-cYnoa3N+UkhSU8A@mail.gmail.com> <c57d43eb0fdb4fd490aab5a45b71104e@WhizzEXM02.whizz.org> <CA+yJO1BHwmQf1vSqMRZfjteZv6jdZwHMoCSNb_YA=2-O6ccDig@mail.gmail.com>

I am not going to check, but Nathan may have sent 5 original emails with 
links to 70 images rather than an almost 1:1 ratio which may have resulted 
in +60 emails (to five groups).... I am not on three of those groups, what 
comments do they make?

john

-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org] On 
Behalf Of Tina Manley
Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2015 8:49 a.m.
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - 
might be solved, in part

I'm going by Steve's comment:

"The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per email, 
Tina
20 emails per pic."

Tina

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> You are going by total emails rather than original emails with link(s) 
> to an image?
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> For March LUG, so far:
>
> Nathan - 106 e-mails
> Tina - 155 e-mails
>
> Not quite 20 to 1.
>
> Tina
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Steve Barbour 
> <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > Steve Barbour
> >
> > On Mar 21, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Also, in the last week - since last Sunday, I have posted 13 photos 
> > on the LUG.  You have posted 70.  Is the difference that you are 
> > sharing and I am asking for help?
> >
> > The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per 
> > email, Tina
> > 20 emails per pic.
> >
> > steve
> >
> > I asked before about posting them one at a time or saving them up 
> > and posting a group.  The opinions seemed to be divided equally - 
> > some wanted one at at time, others preferred a group so I didn't 
> > change
> anything.
> > Maybe I should.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Nathan Wajsman 
> > <photo at frozenlight.eu>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tina,
> > >
> > > May I ask a heretical question: are you perhaps taking too many 
> > > photos, just because it is so easy with digital? You mention a 
> > > figure of 16000
> > from
> > > your Cuba trip, That is more than I take in a year. Now, I realize 
> > > that I am just an amateur while you are a pro, and I also 
> > > understand that for
> > your
> > > stock business you need some slight variations of each image, but 
> > > still
> > the
> > > number seems excessive. From the way you talk about the editing 
> > > process,
> > it
> > > seems to lead to an intolerable burden afterwards, when editing them.
> > > Perhaps a change from this machine-gun approach would be good for 
> > > your health?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Nathan
> > >
> > > Nathan Wajsman
> > >
> > > Alicante, Spain
> > > http://www.frozenlight.eu
> > > http://www.greatpix.eu
> > > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> > > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> > >
> > > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
> > >
> > > YNWA
> > > 


Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
In reply to: Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)