Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2014/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Alternative to the Monochrom
From: red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:03:39 -1000
References: <CA+yJO1BDZepcM5WsMB+T5qME-Z308G6GxthTL0nb3XX3SyMGhQ@mail.gmail.com> <D042510D.26F45%mark@rabinergroup.com> <002501cfd499$dcbecb90$963c62b0$@ca> <54202E64.40307@summaventures.com> <41E3789D-E0BE-4EA5-B404-6A05977781E3@gmail.com> <5421CF23.1030200@summaventures.com> <CA+yJO1DMA8Gv8btmEhfnJ+BmzgP6epgRE3v0EqDbHx_G7yK88Q@mail.gmail.com>
This is a strange way to classify cameras as acceptable for a purpose.
Doesn't the glass count at all?
Frank Filippone
Red735i at verizon.net
On Sep 23, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
Unfortunately, most stock agencies do not accept photos .. Etc.
In reply to:
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Alternative to the Monochrom)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Alternative to the Monochrom)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Alternative to the Monochrom)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Alternative to the Monochrom)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Alternative to the Monochrom)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Alternative to the Monochrom)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Alternative to the Monochrom)