Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'd like to see them exposure color corrected and brought into line they appear to have been over exposed by over two stops then unsuccesvvlly brought down with all kinds of un correctable cross over's. Like red skies and cyan buildings. I think they are unsuccessful scans. They may be impossible to scan. The fuzzy thing is a wash out. People don't do that any more. On 12/16/14 10:30 AM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i at verizon.net> wrote: > Your examples are fuzzy all over. Is this the look you wanted or is it a > selective center sharp focus with surrounding fuzzy otherwise? Limited DOF > or something like fuzzy vignetting? > > Did you try sharp B+W vs Color and fuzzy B+W vs Color? > > If you are going to set your preferences, try out all the combos.... > > Now, about sepia toned fuzzy, B+W..... all the rage in the early 1900's > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > > I am starting to do a series on "Old Buildings that have not been Torn Down > Yet" (*may be slightly tongue in cheek*) Anyway, I am considering whether > to > use one of those old style fuzzy-lens to get certain effect and feelings > across. Attached are 2 pics from the fuzzy-lens and 2 from normal 4x5 lens. > The Stanford Theater shows up on both set so can serve as nice comparison. > > What are you opinions? Which "style" speak to you more? I know the "correct > answer" is which one *I* prefer, but like to hear others' opinions. > Thanks. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/