Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Statistics
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:00:01 -0400
References: <CA+yJO1CN0QYEFR0aJR4KRHnyJePbPnqoTwE-ZHG18S7Qja3pEA@mail.gmail.com> <84259655-77A4-4FD0-937D-C67F43EC5B1B@btinternet.com>

ALL of the out of focus errors with the Fuji were caused by a switch or
button or lens collar moving to a different position by itself.  The manual
focus switch on the front, the aperture ring, the manual/auto focus collar
on the lenses, the exposure controls all moved too easily, especially
bouncing in the back of a truck or messed with by curious kids.  I got so
paranoid that I had to check every setting before I took a photo;
therefore, I used the Leicas more and more on the trip.

Tina


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie at 
btinternet.com>
wrote:

> The focus (or oof) rate is very interesting.
> My observation with autofocus has always been that unless I take a long
> time making sure the autofocus sensor is exactly where I wish focus to
> fall, or I am using a slowish zoom, stopped down, autofocus shots often
> disappoint by not quite having focus where I want it.
> Is this the possibly why you rejected so many of the Fuji shots, or were
> they mainly macro (which almost always have some oof problems IME...). Or
> is it just me who hasn't mastered autofocus for anything other than
> quicksilver grandchildren!
> Frank D
>
> On 13 Jul, 2014, at 22:25, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:
>
> > PESO:
> >
> > This is the kind of thing you can research when you have LR ;-)
> >
> > I have finally finished editing all of the photos from Honduras.  I took
> > 1839 photos in all:  869 with the Fuji, 549 with the M240, and 411 with
> the
> > MM.
> >
> > Of those, I deleted 243 that were out of focus: 206 with the Fuji, 23
> with
> > the M240, and 14 with the MM.
> >
> > From the remaining, I gave my highest rating of 4 stars to 103 photos: 33
> > with the Fuji, 22 with the M240, and 48 with the MM.
> >
> > Of the 7 lenses I used, the ones that did the best were the Leica 35/2.0,
> > Leica 50/1.4, and Leica 90/2.0.
> >
> > What I have concluded is that I love the results I get with the MM.  I
> will
> > be carrying it more often in the future, along with those three lenses.
> >
> > I'm not giving up on the Fuji, but it certainly did not solve my focusing
> > problem and I was encouraged by the number that I did get in focus with
> the
> > Leicas!  Maybe all of that focusing I did with the Auto-refractor helped
> ;-)
> >
> > I hope this is interesting to some.  It was invaluable to me.  I'll be
> > posting some of the 4's next week.
> >
> > Tina
> > --
> > Tina Manley
> > http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
> > http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley
http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/


Replies: Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] Statistics)
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe) ([Leica] Statistics)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Statistics)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Statistics)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Statistics)