Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well said! Curt CB's Ipad On Jan 11, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Jim Shulman <jshulman at judgecrater.com> wrote: > Why not just grab an affordable Leica and shoot pictures? I did > today--shot a roll of Neopan 400 with my M3/Summilux 50, which is drying > now in the shower stall. If we had as many picture posts as we do > discussions on Leica prices and market behavior, the LUG gallery would > overload a server. > > Jim Shulman > Wynnewood, PA > Whose subjects show more spherical aberrations than his lenses. > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf > Of > Mark Rabiner > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 5:30 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas > > Exactly how I feel about it. As it happens to be true as the nose on your > face. > > > On 1/11/14 12:56 PM, "Paul Roark" <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote: > >> For business, it's really >> a question of return on investment. In that respect, digital has >> increased the cost of my "hobby," but it has lowered my "cost of >> business" (due to huge productivity gains). >> >> Paul >> www.PaulRoark.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > -- > Mark William Rabiner > Photographer > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information