Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas
From: roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:56:55 -0800
References: <FBAB3D7B-0CFC-4641-8F26-9924753C67DC@gmail.com> <000e01cf0ef4$62eecce0$28cc66a0$@edu>

>
> ... "rate of inflation" ...


That's a phrase that is subject to many interpretations.

I recall when I spent a summer in Alaska in 1969.  People thought I'd
starve on the $300/month stipend.  They cited the cost of milk and beef --
outrageous.  But, what I found is that dehydrated milk was the same cost as
in California, and fresh salmon and crab were cheap.  We lived rather well
on that.

How the "shopping bag" of goods measured is altered regularly from what I
can see.

With cameras that are for hobbies, the amount of disposable income might be
the appropriate thing to look at, and that might indirectly include (in an
inverse relationship) the housing and car costs.  For business, it's really
a question of return on investment.  In that respect, digital has increased
the cost of my "hobby," but it has lowered my "cost of business" (due to
huge productivity gains).

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com


Replies: Reply from alal at poly.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas)
Message from alal at poly.edu (Akhil Lal) ([Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas)