Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:09:10 -0600
References: <12FD31BAD81A4DEA9F507C8C1EC123BC@jimnichols><366505E6-C56D-4DB9-B6B7-7203503705B7@frozenlight.eu><C55D0308242D40DCB336FB23961CEA78@jimnichols><57DC76A1-5C68-4029-A93B-2AF10C8BBF09@cartersxrd.net><0F987371965B438096A45440035D7F8E@jimnichols> <CABNC8Srk305WhE8_udV5DASqPasEw7ZOO+BQmSDVKfXKJvyx4A@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the kind words.  However, my Summitar was made in 1949, while the 
Summicron was introduced in 1953.  I doubt it could be one of the hybrids, 
but it does produce good images.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cedric Agie" <cedric.agie at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf


> I'm certainly not an expert of older Leitz lenses, in short I'm not
> really fond of Leica lenses made before the discovery by Leitz of new
> elements (i.e. high refraction obtained with Lanthan etc) and
> multicoating. As we all know you cannot judge a lens from a Computer
> screen or a television set, but looking at the brillant colors,
> contrasts and sharpness etc in these excellent pictures,  I would
> rather have the impression that they where taken with a Summicron
> lens. Wich could be the case as I mentionned before.
>
> At the end of the Summitar 50 mm production Leitz produced a small
> number of these new lenses under the name Summitar, but in fact these
> where issued with the new Summicron formulas to test the market. Only
> the serial number could give an indication. They used the same trick
> with the first Summilux 50mm 1.4 lenses that arrived under the the
> name of the former Summarit 50mm f1.5.
>
> My advise; never sell such a lens.
>
> Cedric
>
> 2013/2/20 Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>:
>> I checked the CameraQuest site.  That is a lot of money to invest in gear
>> with limited usefulness!  Might be fun, though.
>>
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "RicCarter" <ric at cartersxrd.net>
>>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:53 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf
>>
>>
>>> you can get back some of the old fun by strapping one of the CV 
>>> ultrawides
>>> and accessory finders on the the III
>>>
>>> the 12 is great fun on it
>>>
>>> ric
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:40 PM, "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols at lighttube.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The main reason I gave up on the IIIf was that my eyes and glasses just
>>>> don't perform like they did when I was younger.  The small RF/VF 
>>>> windows are
>>>> a pain for me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)
Message from cedric.agie at gmail.com (Cedric Agie) ([Leica] IMG: Film Images from Leica IIIf)