Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] George L's poll
From: cedric.agie at gmail.com (Cedric Agie)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:52:51 +0100
References: <CD16065B.3565%mark@rabinergroup.com> <4367F7B3-FE04-4E55-8BE9-EA1AE50A94AA@mac.com> <50F0D8F7.6090404@jayburleson.com> <F31054AA-A4C2-47C8-A7BD-72D45BDF9B7A@mac.com>

In my case photography is a family affair on both sides and from the
beginning of its history. I developped and printed my first (contact)
prints at the age of 7 . A friend at school had his father working at
the Gevaert/Agfa factory in Antwerp, so I got booklets, paper and
chemicals for free. After a small twin lens box camera I still have, I
started with 2 Minolta reflex cameras and several lenses. Soon after I
discoverd the first Rollei Computer flash systhem, the two of them
(with new batteries) are still working!  At the age of 20 I got bitten
by the Leitz and Leica systhem; first a Leica IIIF and a (never used)
Leica II in pristine state. A Focomat IC soon followed. Not to speak
of the family bathroom for the children being often converted to a B&W
and color darkroom, wich enraged my brothers and sisters who had to
retreat to our parent's bathroom.

Years later, after one of my 2 Minoltas collapsed a few days before a
wedding, I switched to Leica M and Leicaflex SL. Several M's followed
over the years, M5, M-4s, M4-2,M-6, M-7 and recently a wonderfull M-9
wich I soon installed on the famous Leitz slide copyrig gear, Visoflex
I and III. Recently I bought 2 brand new R-8 for almost nothing. I'm
sure sooner or later I will find myself a DMR. I can even put early
made (bayonnet) Summaron 35mm 2.8 and Elmar 50mm 2.8  on my M-9 with
astonishing results

And not to speak of all the other Leica, Leicaflex Sl, R and Leica
lenses going from 21 up to 400 mm and an identical history with
Hasselblad, i.e. 2x 500CM and a 500ELM.

Years ago I inevitably became a professor of optics and photograpy. I
still use my Leitz enlargers (Focomat IC&IIC and V-35). I don't
despise digital photography, at the contrary, but from my experience
it are the optics that count. With the exception of the 2 screw lens
Leicas, the 2 Minoltas and a Rolleighflex I hated to use because of
its fuzzy viewing systhem, I never sold a lens or a camera.

Dont think I despise the other brands. Again it is the final print
that counts, not the many words I regularly hear and read.

I'am also a happy man because my son (age 18) soon (at 7) showed he
has photographers eyes and brains without any help or intervention
from my part.

Kind regards.

Cedric Agie
cedric.agie at gmail.com


2013/1/12 Tarek Charara <tcharara at mac.com>:
> These days it's 70% of the time M & R.
> the rest is divided between Pentax 67, Rolleiflex and Pinhole.
>
> It all depends on the project I'm working on.
>
> All the best from Paris!
>
> Tarek
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> Tarek Charara
> <http://www.tarekcharara.com>
>
> NO ARCHIVE
>
>
>
>
> On 1/11/2013 3:39 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>>
>> I'd have interest in knowing
>> how many Leica User Group members
>> still actually use Leica cameras
>> a) occasionally
>> b) most of the time
>> c) exclusively
>>
>> I'm a Leica User for 90% of my photography
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] R3 owners.... AT)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] R3 owners.... AT)
Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] George L's poll)
Message from tcharara at mac.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] George L's poll)