Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, horses for courses of course. Paul does stitching, and focus stacking, handheld on his M9. While you can do that with an Alpa, the M9 is just faster to work with in that sense. For myself, I still prefer "taking it in one shot" than stitching, although the focus stack can be quite nice to have, eliminating one of the major needs for camera movement. On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Robert G Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: > How so? If you mean by merging, stitching, the pixels per unit of image > circle is far greater in the best MFDB than in the M9 (or even N 800E). > > For a 50mm field of view the new Leica M250 will still have 25 megapixels > of coverage. A 80 MP digital back will have 80 megapixels for the same > field of view with an 80mm lens. If you want to throw stitching into the > mix then, as you know George, we need to compare that to stitching with MF. > > But if you mean something else by merging, I don't know what that term > means but would love to know! > Best, > Bob > > > Bob Adler > > On Dec 31, 2012, at 9:38 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Dec 31, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Robert Adler wrote: > > > >> Not too sure about it rivaling medium to large format... > > > > I'd imagine that exposing and merging multiple M9 frames > > would begin to "rival" medium format CCD sensor real estate ;~) > > > > Regards, > > George Lottermoser > > george at imagist.com > > http://www.imagist.com > > http://www.imagist.com/blog > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>