Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:34:03 -0500
References: <D9C01005-E718-47B4-B7DD-F25EA3716979@mac.com> <592833333.14716580.1356895625999.JavaMail.root@cds036> <CA+yJO1A+QxSzgW6PTb0fAqdd-Bfe4GqcJVNZhU7ENk=9zMM6PA@mail.gmail.com> <72E3BA90-2255-40F9-8D46-98DFC82A248B@gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh4NDyw4MQoumRS5FgnVp9EMQCu=NSg8jaz-+XW0jLz+8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAsXt4OFyT3015VPr_taAOiZ=XrT0poh+i+E=Yw0Vmym=-MgPw@mail.gmail.com> <8D951663-1907-4D08-BBDB-94BCAD05C89D@mac.com> <17EA619B-4549-4137-B3A6-6F2C9122DA53@gmail.com>

Paul does focus stacking and stiching, combining many, many photos in one.
 The focus stacking is amazing and I want to try it someday.

Tina

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Robert G Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> How so? If you mean by merging, stitching, the pixels per unit of image
> circle is far greater in the best MFDB than in the M9 (or even N 800E).
>
> For a 50mm field of view the new Leica M250 will still have 25 megapixels
> of coverage. A 80 MP digital back will have 80 megapixels for the same
> field of view with an 80mm lens. If you want to throw stitching into the
> mix then, as you know George, we need to compare that to stitching with MF.
>
> But if you mean something else by merging, I don't know what that term
> means but would love to know!
> Best,
> Bob
>
>
> Bob Adler
>
> On Dec 31, 2012, at 9:38 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> 
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Dec 31, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Robert Adler wrote:
> >
> >> Not too sure about it rivaling medium to large format...
> >
> > I'd imagine that exposing and merging multiple M9 frames
> > would begin to "rival" medium format CCD sensor real estate ;~)
> >
> > Regards,
> > George Lottermoser
> > george at imagist.com
> > http://www.imagist.com
> > http://www.imagist.com/blog
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert G Adler) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
In reply to: Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (TED GRANT) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert G Adler) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)