Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9…bokeh
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:44:00 -0800
References: <7452113.1354158181167.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <5EF4C6BC-315A-49D4-85BB-3510FEF90256@usjet.net> <41C780C8-EBE9-4D71-91A1-8A0FF8E18F17@gmail.com> <00D1A040-7150-4380-8AFC-524717261FB4@usjet.net>

On Nov 28, 2012, at 11:44 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> wrote:

> Doug --  I think you have described and summed up the situation just 
> right.   Robert
> 
> 
> On Nov 29, 2012, at 12:03 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> my spell checker changed bokeh to bolshevik,  though I am sure bokeh 
>> existed before the word.  It however needed fast high quality lenses, 
>> that would be routinely ! shot effectively wide open, for very narrow 
>> dof, to see the effect that we call bokeh.....perhaps that was the key 
>> raison d'etre that caused leica lenses to be associated with bokeh. 
>> Pioneers like our Ted Grant, by shooting fast leica lenses wide open, 
>> were creating a new vision, and ultimately a new word.... though they 
>> deny this being their reason or their goal.

I believe that this is correct, I do think it is evident in the images Ted 
and others produced, way back then in pre history,  

btw, I should have put my name here,  



Steve





>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Thanks, Doug, for still understanding what I was writing.   Your point, 
>>> though, is not as self-obvious as it would first appear.   Linguists 
>>> have found that different language groups divide the visible spectrum up 
>>> in different ways and have names for different colors within the 
>>> continuum of the spectrum, so that, for example,  some cultures  have 
>>> only two words for the range from yellow through green to blue, omitting 
>>> our word green.   When asked what they call what we see as green, they 
>>> answer either yellow or blue, depending on where the shade of green 
>>> falls.   They don't "see" green, only yellow and blue.   So does green 
>>> exist for them?   No, it doesn't:  what they see is either yellow or 
>>> blue.
>>> 
>>> Did bokeh exist for us before we borrowed the Japanese word for it and 
>>> became aware of it?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 28, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Robert Meier wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nobody knew what broken was. 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> We didn't have a word for it.  That doesn't preclude its existence.
>>>> 
>>>> Doug Herr
>>>> Birdman of Sacramento
>>>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9…bokeh)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9…bokeh)