Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Marty, shutter lag in digital M
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:39:48 -0500

Is the digital m is in no ones hands yet I wonder who it is which is
noticing the shutter lag which I doubt is there as there would be no reason
for it to be and no reason for Leica to allow it to be there if it tried.

Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: "jon.streeter" <jon.streeter at cox.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 05:12:53 -0800
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Marty, shutter lag in digital M
> 
> It is not an issue for some; for others it is.
> 
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Scott Gregory" <scottgregory at mac.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Marty, shutter lag in digital M
> Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 3:53 am
> 
> 
> Cannot believe how critical you guys are with this shutter lag discussion. 
> I
> do street shooting all the time and never notice a problem or have an issue
> and have used both an M8 and now the 9.
> 
> Scott 
> 
> Scott
> 
> On 2012-11-06, at 12:23 AM, jon.streeter <jon.streeter at cox.net> wrote:
> 
>> Thank you, Marty.  This is exACTly the kind of info I was looking for.  A
>> digital M in theory would be a dream camera, allowing one to shoot to 
>> one's
>> heart's in a wide range of ISOs and in black and white and color.  But all
>> these advantages are worthless if the camera has to think it over before
>> taking the picture.  Unforgivable in a Leica.  I'll hang on to my relics 
>> and
>> delight in the time I spend with them.  I'd post a portrait if I could 
>> figure
>> out how.  
>> 
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
>> 
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Marty Deveney" <benedenia at gmail.com>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: [Leica] Kate Kirkwood and Leica Liker
>> Date: Mon, Nov 5, 2012 7:44 pm
>> 
>> 
>>> Now that the digital M
>>> cameras have long shutter-lag times even when compared to DSLRs, suddenly
>>> we're hearing that shutter lag doesn't matter, that nobody notices it.
>>> Really?  Nobody?  For capturing fleeting expressions in a portrait 
>>> session,
>>> nobody has noticed it?
>> 
>> The M8, M9 and Monochrom lag time is about 1/13s.  To me it's the most
>> substantial problem with all these cameras.  It's been discussed here
>> widely before:
>> http://leica-users.org/v43/msg02993.html
>> http://leica-users.org/v44/msg03170.html
>> 
>> Leica has stated that the new M (typ 240) has new architecture that
>> makes the camera faster and the shutter feel smoother.  The dummy
>> cameras that have been doing the rounds at the trade fairs seem to
>> display at least the latter, while no-one has measured the former.
>> 
>> Marty
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] Marty, shutter lag in digital M)
In reply to: Message from jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter) ([Leica] Marty, shutter lag in digital M)