Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]With the new Leica M as well as the Monochrom you're able to both capture the action and get depth of field. That's not what you could do with an M9 before and not what you can do with the ME now as long as they make them which wont be long. A great investment for collectors. Your Leica bellies will be going up up up with their rarity. They are under the idea that there is a contingent of people who think Leica is selling out by going CMOS and they are playing to that. I think they are going to find that that group is close to non existent. But they are more so playing to a group who will be put off by the comparatively phantasmagorically high tech features of the Leica M digital. People who think all those "Man from Uncle" add on's you are somehow being forced to buy and that you can not take them off have have something which looks like a real Leica M of decades gone by. Or your you cant just switch them off. Buying an ME at this point is a block headed way to waste several grand. The CMOS in the new M digital will make for a Leica digital camera which from a functionality standpoint leaved the CCD sensor in the dust. The Leica is foremost a hand held street camera. And the streets are dark 50% of the time. And the night time is the right time to be with the one you love. And catch the best shots. Also lots of times instead of outdoors you're indoors. Things happen inside a lot too. In low light. Perfect for Leica optics and Leica rangefinder configuration. An ME is a Leica M with pulled tri x in it you can never take out. As is an M9. While the M is a Leica M with pushed Tmax 3200 in it but with the quality of plus X. its functionality is miles ahead of the ME or 9 to even consider those camera means you really have your head in the sand are are totally out of the loupe. Not necessarily in that order. Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 02:57:47 +0000 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Raw MM Files > > I thinking it will be taking over from the M9 (only differences are looks, > no > USB or frame chooser) once the M (240) is on the market; so M, MM and M-E > will be the range for new cameras for a while... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > Though not a lot of people are going to be trading in their M9's for an > M-E. > As its for people who cant afford an M9. And if you already owned and M9 > that > kind of indicates that you can afford one. > > Mark William Rabiner >> >> On Oct 31, 2012, at 5:56 AM, Richard Man wrote: >> >>> Well yes of course, but I'm not sure the tradeoff between an ME for >>> $5400 with color options vs. an MM for $8000 with better tonality is >>> the right tradeoff. >>> >>> If they are both priced at $5000, then I'd jump for the MM too (if I >>> have the budget) >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> For me it is the tonality, never got the same from an M9 conversion. >>>> I am more than happy with my MM compared to the 3200dpi Hasselblad >>>> scans (FP4+) I made earlier this year.... >> >> So very personal >> on almost every single level of evaluation (from economic to the >> tonal) >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information