Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Raw MM Files
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 02:57:47 +0000
References: <F943F429-57CF-4200-BAE3-61B4EB7AB55B@mac.com> <CCB75CEB.25815%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I thinking it will be taking over from the M9 (only differences are looks, 
no USB or frame chooser) once the M (240)  is on the market; so M, MM and 
M-E will be the range for new cameras for a while...

john

-----Original Message-----

Though not a lot of people are going to be trading in their M9's for an M-E.
As its for people who cant afford an M9. And if you already owned and M9 
that kind of indicates that you can afford one.

Mark William Rabiner
> 
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 5:56 AM, Richard Man wrote:
> 
>> Well yes of course, but I'm not sure the tradeoff between an ME for 
>> $5400 with color options vs. an MM for $8000 with better tonality is 
>> the right tradeoff.
>> 
>> If they are both priced at $5000, then I'd jump for the MM too (if I 
>> have the budget)
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> For me it is the tonality, never got the same from an M9 conversion. 
>>> I am more than happy with my MM compared to the 3200dpi Hasselblad 
>>> scans (FP4+) I made earlier this year....
> 
> So very personal
> on almost every single level of evaluation (from economic to the 
> tonal)
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser


Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Raw MM Files)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Raw MM Files)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Raw MM Files)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Raw MM Files)