Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Polly and Laura, II
From: curtisbliss at yahoo.com (CB)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CA+yJO1CQbxzAmqMGUXLG=MaYUfmaz-0MAonkafAJKiC12U971A@mail.gmail.com>

I like the regular LR conversion best.? The other looks overly blown out 
with contrast.? The first LR conversion could use some fine tuning but of 
course I'm only looking on my crummy Dell laptop!

 

________________________________
 From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
To: MUGers at yahoogroups.com; lug <lug at leica-users.org>; paw <paw at 
micapeak.com>; seephoto <seephoto at micapeak.com>; Olympus Camera 
Discussion <olympus at thomasclausen.net> 
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:52 AM
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Polly and Laura, II
  
PESO:

Thanks for all of the comments on Polly and Laura!? Here is the next shot
in that series, unmanipulated, straight conversion to jpeg in LR:

http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/146619111

You can switch back and forth between the two:

http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/146602122

Is it better with the Silver Efex treatment, or not?

TIA for any comments and criticisms.

Tina
-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Polly and Laura, II)