Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Philichrome XVII - Ponte Vecchio
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 22:25:47 +0200
References: <DC4600F7-94A1-4EF8-8080-97407D26D917@sfr.fr> <C7E5065F-F29E-4EB2-A412-79C1BBA335C7@mac.com>

+1

It is really beautiful! a perfect "Amard"!

cheers
Lluis



El 04/10/2012, a las 21:44, George Lottermoser escribi?:

>
> On Sep 3, 2012, at 4:05 PM, philippe.amard wrote:
>
>> Meant to be viewed large, but a yard from screen
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/csjjn4g
>
> still catching up from a month ago ;~(
> anyway
>
> this is a beautiful example of
> walking the tightrope between
> "photographic" and "manipulated" and "looks-like-a-painting"
> in that
> it maintains its own integrity a digital photograph
>
> IMO
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Philichrome XVII - Ponte Vecchio)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Philichrome XVII - Ponte Vecchio)