Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Philichrome XVII - Ponte Vecchio
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:44:10 -0500
References: <DC4600F7-94A1-4EF8-8080-97407D26D917@sfr.fr>
 
On Sep 3, 2012, at 4:05 PM, philippe.amard wrote:

> Meant to be viewed large, but a yard from screen
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/csjjn4g

still catching up from a month ago ;~(
anyway

this is a beautiful example of
walking the tightrope between
"photographic" and "manipulated" and "looks-like-a-painting"
in that
it maintains its own integrity a digital photograph

IMO

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] IMG: Philichrome XVII - Ponte Vecchio)
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Philichrome XVII - Ponte Vecchio - George)
 In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Philichrome XVII - Ponte Vecchio)