Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/08/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 19:35:19 -0500
References: <CE1DF323-7159-4905-A41D-E143289C6367@gmail.com> <CC4D8590.223A6%mark@rabinergroup.com> <002a01cd78df$d37b3680$7a71a380$@cox.net> <CABmfTOWEuwjdFJ7o_cPcaeC2FhZ9SWWeZCbMepie+qZtiUxAsA@mail.gmail.com> <002c01cd78e7$25ab3c50$7101b4f0$@cox.net> <CABmfTOUuEqunHULSyox3MO4cvkEMCEBFrCn9h3Z=+YBUuFfLTQ@mail.gmail.com>
So much for that plan...I don't have any images worth that much.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Marty
Deveney
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 7:15 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.
> ....I wonder
> what a 16x20 pt/pd print would cost these days? It was not exactly
> cheap when I was making 8x10 contact prints.
Here in Australia, about $45, not counting time/labour, and depending on the
paper stock. I costed it for someone the other day.
Marty
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to:
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] New on my Blog: Paris 1990 new pics)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)