Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Third party M to X adapter
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:49:02 -0700
References: <mailman.423.1334529333.51800.lug@leica-users.org> <E64C7C75-9302-411F-A065-E5E7EDFB2E4D@netvigator.com> <87D4C7D9-B15E-4A47-9F03-C58B86655580@gmail.com> <21D3A472-CE2B-4F30-A01D-425FB795BC24@ameritech.net> <C01D5CEB-0EB3-47A4-B66A-65BBAE0CCDE1@gmail.com> <CC5DCBBF-9942-45B0-ADF4-A7E6C55C5362@ameritech.net>

On Apr 16, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Dante Stella wrote:

> Steve -
> 
> That yield is better than my digital M, sadly (and the Leica is only 
> really powering the most basic functions, not a hybrid vf with auto 
> playback, after-the-fact raw reconversion, etc.). 
> 
> To increase the yield, there is a power save mode that will get you up 
> around 350, but it reduces the focusing speed.  I suppose you could also 
> shoot JPG, which would reduce write times and the power needed from that.
> 
> As to a Fuji adapter, I would not be surprised to see the ability to set 
> focal length via a 1-6 switch (the camera has a menu where you can assign 
> a focal length to "lenses" 1-6).  A rudimentary distance encoder would 
> help adjust the framelines to the right size when zone focusing with wides.
> 
> Dante


thanks Dante, very helpful...


Steve


> 
> On Apr 16, 2012, at 12:45, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Apr 16, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Dante Stella wrote:
>> 
>>> Usually the problem is that the adapter is too thin, allowing infinity 
>>> focus but screwing up the distance scale.
>>> 
>>> My X-Pro gets about 250 shots on a charge; fewer than 100 with an Eye-Fi 
>>> card.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> pretty poor...
>> 
>> 
>> what can one do to increase the yield per charge?
>> 
>> 
>>> Any word with the Fuji adapter and features other than being a "dumb" 
>>> tube? The 35 Fujinon is incredible - it might take some motivation to 
>>> even think about mounting M lenses. 
>> 
>> 
>> I agree...
>> 
>>> 
>>> But given that engineering a simple tube between two lens mounts takes 
>>> all of about five minutes (witness how the Kipon adapter was being sold 
>>> a week or so after the camera hit Japan)  I would expect something more 
>>> special out of the Fuji item.
>> 
>> like what?
>> 
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Dante
>>> 
>>> On Apr 16, 2012, at 10:47, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 16, 2012, at 5:52 AM, H&ECummer wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Luggers,
>>>>> I am safely back in Canada - amazed at the lack of crowds and the 
>>>>> clearness of the air. Just prior to my departure to Canada, I picked 
>>>>> up a-just-delivered-from-the-factory Shogun M to X adapter from their 
>>>>> shop on Lock Road in Tsim Sha Tsui. Kowloon.  I have been playing with 
>>>>> the adapter and all my Leica lenses. In sum, although nicely made, it 
>>>>> does not provide sharp focus at infinity* for my 18mm, 24mm, several 
>>>>> 35mm lenses or 50mm summilux Asph. Longer telephoto lengths (Cosina 
>>>>> 75, 90 Elmarit, 135 Elmar) maintain better infinity focus but still 
>>>>> not tack sharp.  Also if the Tri Elmar is mounted the 35 setting will 
>>>>> not lock on and you cannot, without a great deal of perplexing effort 
>>>>> and careful jimmy-ing get the adapter off. GIven the delicacy of the 
>>>>> focal length shifting mechanism on the 3T that was a heart stopping 
>>>>> moment. I took test pictures of city lights at dawn (up because of Jet 
>>>>> lag) on a tripod at ISO 3200 but I am not going to bother to post 
>>>>> them. The descriptio
> n
>> 
>>> a
>>>> bo
>>>>> ve sums it up. If anyone wants to see a set of the photos please 
>>>>> contact me off list. In sum the impression is that there is potential 
>>>>> here but the adapter obviously needs to be precision measured and 
>>>>> made. Fuji's surely will be. Joseph Yao says he thinks what I have 
>>>>> from Shogun may be just slightly too thick. Of course accurate 
>>>>> handheld focusing with 10X magnification will be hit and miss for most 
>>>>> unless the camera is on a tripod. For myself I think it may be better 
>>>>> to stick with Fuji lenses and autofocus given my tri focal eyes.
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Howard
>>>>> * infinity meaning the lens is set on infinity and city lights in 
>>>>> North Vancouver (several miles away) are pin pricks of light on the 
>>>>> sensor when in focus.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> thanks Howard,    please let me know when the Fuji adapter M to X comes 
>>>> out.  How much was the Shogun?  How are you doing in terms of battery 
>>>> life?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Steve
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from cummer at netvigator.com (H&ECummer) ([Leica] Third party M to X adapter)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Third party M to X adapter)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] Third party M to X adapter)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Third party M to X adapter)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] Third party M to X adapter)