Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon
From: chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford)
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:39:59 -0400

Jesus, Richard, now you're going to get Mark to foaming at the mouth
again! Thanks! :D~

-- 
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-437-8990

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook



On 4/6/12 12:33 AM, "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote:

>I went to photograph inside a high tech company today for the Faces of the
>SmartWorld 
><http://richardmanphoto.com/Portfolio/FacesoftheSmartWorld.pdf>project.
>The indoor light is not bright enough for Tri-X and I didn't want
>to use a tripod so I was mainly using the M9 with the 50'lux and the 25
>Biogon ZM.
>
>If you look at the lens diagram, the 25 Biogon ZM does look rather like
>the
>"original" Biogon. Performance wise, it's good. Very good image quality.
>But distortion wise, there is no comparison to the true Biogon SWC. The
>difference is startling.
>
>Next time I'm going to bring a tripod...
>
>-- 
>// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)