Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 75 Summilux a Big Thankyou
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:14:57 +0100
References: <CAEve6Xh1LXQXV0zEMf_ZNS5pbjMjR969cY6gAKupyKtC3bodRA@mail.gmail.com> <CALCsb0ERCz=LsOMGd6josP6v0_74NJY2oeHOvwNBziZVmWF6OQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-H+0+XxFJSLS_=XDxjOHkK5aqi9c2d27b1pSZnM3gEKGw@mail.gmail.com>

Exactly! I am much more likely to be influenced by the opinion of someone 
here whose work I know and respect than by some guy who blogs about 
equipment.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Mar 23, 2012, at 5:47 AM, Richard Man wrote:

> Because we have been hanging out for a while and we know each other's work?
> I don't agree with everything Mark says, but I sure would pay attention to
> some of stuff he says. And if Herr Doug Herr (ha ha, I am so clever) says
> this is how you do things. It's worth a listen. Ditto Tina etc. etc.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Kay Yang <liangjiyang at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> How is that different from someone asking for opinions in this group and
>> later decides to buy the lens? Many people had never owned this lens or
>> even known about it before and Steve's review just opened the door for his
>> readers.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:59 PM, scleroplex <scleroplex at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> it is ridiculous and it is real and we are, mostly, sheep.
>>> 
>>> there it is.
>>> 
>>> do see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
>>> 
>>> and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomon_Asch
>>> 
>>> and a recent repeat using functional MR imaging -
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:F1sH6awN8KcJ:www.ccnl.emory.edu/greg/Berns%2520Conformity%2520final%2520printed.pdf+berns+conformity&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESj28bT8edpQCjot7EJFuR687DWZGNT_ozr3W8JnKeUIRv_PltT8QDnNWBc9Zr5UVNw1IS54_tAn3KERPOSBRyShza52Yiztcj5B6UuqY5KK3kcLFDlKzwrz2dIe6EdOG_uT1NvR&sig=AHIEtbQdQKkrfL8OpEXF-15p28r0R5toEQ&pli=1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:36:05 +0530
>>> From: Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] 75 Summilux a Big Thankyou
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>      <CAH1UNJ1bx0JXG161zYFDrb0E14Lo_Jzs-vegQK3-dFp5h5T0=
>> g at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>> 
>>> Natthan,
>>> I agree with you. Just proves that deep down, we are all just sheep...
>>> Cheers
>>> Jayanand
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks Geoff. I think the idea that some blogger most people have never
>>>> heard of has this kind of impact is ridiculous.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Nathan
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] 75 Summilux a Big Thankyou)
Message from liangjiyang at gmail.com (Kay Yang) ([Leica] 75 Summilux a Big Thankyou)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 75 Summilux a Big Thankyou)