Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Perar 28 looks good to me!
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:47:02 -0800
References: <CAF8hL-E=AEW1C7Ym_1drADQNkWNjJRX3Xwns-BCRd_2Dwe2LdA@mail.gmail.com> <22875DB3C85F49C28E750B7DC1EE2AF1@jimnichols>

Thanks Jim, the glowing red lights must have fooled LR's auto WB function.

It's very odd - I have never seen an artificial tree like that before.They
were really pretty all lit up during Christmas.

When we first saw the flags on the trees, my wife asked if I am shooting
B&W and I said I was, then I remember I am shooting with the M9 and has the
option of NOT converting to B&W :-)

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at 
lighttube.net>wrote:

> Richard,
>
> Except for the first one, the BW images are great.  I find the color in
> the last two to be oversaturated.  Just my 2 cts.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Man" <
> richard at richardmanphoto.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 10:53 PM
> Subject: [Leica] Perar 28 looks good to me!
>
>
>  Took the Perar 28 for a bike ride to downtown. Totally disgusted at Larry
>> Page new mansion - a 3 story thing that will dwarf even the big houses
>> around it.
>>
>> Anyway, back to the Perar 28. Mark is right in the sense that the out of
>> focus area, particularly close to the corners, the OoF image just sort of
>> have a shear look to them. I am sure there's a technical term for this
>> type
>> of aberration. This is a bit unusual lens for me as I mostly have late
>> versions of sharp lens, e.g. 50 'lux ASPH, 35 'lux ASPH, 85/2 Sonnar, 25
>> ZM
>> etc. and of course the XPan lens are also without peer.
>>
>> So the question is, does the rest of the image quality and the size
>> advantage compensates for this flaw? You be the judge:
>>
>> http://richardmanphoto.com/**PICS/Perar28/<http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/Perar28/>
>>
>> Still not a whole lot of processing, but I did fix some vignetting using
>> LR. One thing about the Perar is that it is quite sharp at the focused
>> area. Looking at these images, I am quite happy with them. The lens is
>> tiny
>> and is a joy to use. It's not for everybody but it works for me. If I am
>> going out explicitly for shooting, then a better lens will be warranted
>> but
>> for the "always have a camera with you" situation, it works quite well
>> enough. If you use it on one of the mirrorless cameras with smaller
>> sensor,
>> then even the corner performance is not going to be an issue.
>>
>> The Perar 35 does not have this issue and I think is optically superior.
>> However, the handling is not as nice as the Perar 28.
>>
>>
>> --
>> // richard 
>> <http://www.richardmanphoto.**com<http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>> >
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Perar 28 looks good to me!)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Perar 28 looks good to me!)