Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Perar 28 looks good to me!
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:21:13 -0600
References: <CAF8hL-E=AEW1C7Ym_1drADQNkWNjJRX3Xwns-BCRd_2Dwe2LdA@mail.gmail.com>

Richard,

Except for the first one, the BW images are great.  I find the color in the 
last two to be oversaturated.  Just my 2 cts.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 10:53 PM
Subject: [Leica] Perar 28 looks good to me!


> Took the Perar 28 for a bike ride to downtown. Totally disgusted at Larry
> Page new mansion - a 3 story thing that will dwarf even the big houses
> around it.
>
> Anyway, back to the Perar 28. Mark is right in the sense that the out of
> focus area, particularly close to the corners, the OoF image just sort of
> have a shear look to them. I am sure there's a technical term for this 
> type
> of aberration. This is a bit unusual lens for me as I mostly have late
> versions of sharp lens, e.g. 50 'lux ASPH, 35 'lux ASPH, 85/2 Sonnar, 25 
> ZM
> etc. and of course the XPan lens are also without peer.
>
> So the question is, does the rest of the image quality and the size
> advantage compensates for this flaw? You be the judge:
>
> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/Perar28/
>
> Still not a whole lot of processing, but I did fix some vignetting using
> LR. One thing about the Perar is that it is quite sharp at the focused
> area. Looking at these images, I am quite happy with them. The lens is 
> tiny
> and is a joy to use. It's not for everybody but it works for me. If I am
> going out explicitly for shooting, then a better lens will be warranted 
> but
> for the "always have a camera with you" situation, it works quite well
> enough. If you use it on one of the mirrorless cameras with smaller 
> sensor,
> then even the corner performance is not going to be an issue.
>
> The Perar 35 does not have this issue and I think is optically superior.
> However, the handling is not as nice as the Perar 28.
>
>
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Perar 28 looks good to me!)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Perar 28 looks good to me!)