Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The final gasp of MF film?
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:28:37 +0000
References: <CAF8hL-GYA-TnC=rVhuSgU7gAwuFZ_A8RxTofGnVgC2wZDM1MzA@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9412EEC84@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>, <CABmfTOXcBOcW6+8ZgGhN7AaEfe=+5NS=kg=7yQu86or9ThE-KQ@mail.gmail.com>

20"x24" with El-Nikkor (I don't think APO lenses were out when I last 
printed in 1997) on Oriental Seagull with a 13" Kamm (well adjusted).

john
________________________________________


My guess is that you never noticed much difference when wet printing
either because you didn't enlarge enough, or your enlarging system had
enough factors to degrade the image quality (lens, alignment,
stability) to a point where they were about equivalent. 


Replies: Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] The final gasp of MF film?)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The final gasp of MF film?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] The final gasp of MF film?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] The final gasp of MF film?)