Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Predator/prey, re-processed
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:59:35 -0600
References: <380-220122214154652644@M2W124.mail2web.com> <A08D701E-D36E-4434-9B59-57213B79DC2A@mac.com>

George and Doug,

I had the same feeling when I viewed them.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Predator/prey, re-processed


>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 9:46 AM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net wrote:
>
>> original:
>>
>> http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/ardeidae/L1640293.jpg
>>
>> re-processed:
>>
>> http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/ardeidae/caegre04.jpg
>
> Outstanding photograph!
>
> On my monitor the re-processed version looks too warm/red.
> Though it also has more brightness and sparkle (in the eye).
> It looks to me that the final version may fall between the two presented 
> here.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] IMG: Predator/prey, re-processed)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Predator/prey, re-processed)